State v. Cockerham

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Cockerham

245 So. 3d 1035

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 15, 2018

DocketNo. 2017–KO–1802

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 245 So. 3d 1035 (State v. Cockerham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Cockerham, 245 So. 3d 1035 (La. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

GENOVESE, J., would grant for the reasons assigned by Judge Holdridge.

CRICHTON, J., would grant in part and assigns reasons:

*1036As Judge Holdridge notes in his dissent below, without an amendment to the habitual offender bill of information by the district attorney, the district court was limited to sentencing the defendant as a third-felony offender. I agree and would therefore reverse the fourth-felony adjudication and remand to the district court for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GENOVESE, J., would grant for the reasons assigned by Judge Holdridge.

CRICHTON, J., would grant in part and assigns reasons:

*1036As Judge Holdridge notes in his dissent below, without an amendment to the habitual offender bill of information by the district attorney, the district court was limited to sentencing the defendant as a third-felony offender. I agree and would therefore reverse the fourth-felony adjudication and remand to the district court for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 So. 3d 1035, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cockerham-la-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack