State v. Cochran

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Charles Wayne Cochran, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2010-162208

Appeal From York County

John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-419 Submitted July 2, 2012 – Filed July 11, 2012

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Charles Wayne Cochran appeals his probation revocation, arguing the circuit court abused its discretion in revoking his probation based partially on his failure to complete a condition of his probation that was not specifically ordered during sentencing. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PIEPER, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.