State v. Cochran

2014 Ohio 100, 4 N.E.3d 1039, 138 Ohio St. 3d 166
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 23, 2014·No. 2013-0464·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} Appellant’s request that this cause be held for the decision in case No. 2013-1255, State v. Rogers, is denied. Appellee’s motion for summary affirmance is granted, and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Washington, 137 Ohio St.3d 427, 2013-Ohio-4982, 999 N.E.2d 661.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Cochran, 2014 Ohio 100, 4 N.E.3d 1039, 138 Ohio St. 3d 166 (Ohio 2014).

2014 Ohio 100 (State v. Cochran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Washington
2013 Ohio 4982 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2013)
State v. Washington
137 Ohio St. 3d 427 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2013)