State v. Cochran

2014 Ohio 100, 4 N.E.3d 1039, 138 Ohio St. 3d 166
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 23, 2014
Docket2013-0464
StatusPublished

This text of 2014 Ohio 100 (State v. Cochran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Cochran, 2014 Ohio 100, 4 N.E.3d 1039, 138 Ohio St. 3d 166 (Ohio 2014).

Opinion

{¶ 1} Appellant’s request that this cause be held for the decision in case No. 2013-1255, State v. Rogers, is denied. Appellee’s motion for summary affirmance is granted, and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Washington, 137 Ohio St.3d 427, 2013-Ohio-4982, 999 N.E.2d 661.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Washington
2013 Ohio 4982 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2013)
State v. Washington
137 Ohio St. 3d 427 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2014 Ohio 100, 4 N.E.3d 1039, 138 Ohio St. 3d 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cochran-ohio-2014.