State v. Coccomo

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Coccomo

978 A.2d 1111, 293 Conn. 909, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 435

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 9, 2009·No. SC 18443·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 115 Conn. [910] App. 384 (AC 28819), is granted, limited to the following issue:

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18443. Robin S. Schwartz, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Robert S. Bello and Thomas M. Cassone, in opposition. Decided September 9, 2009

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting evidence of a transfer of property for less than fair value as evidence of consciousness of guilt and that such admission of evidence was not harmless?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 115 Conn. [910] App. 384 (AC 28819), is granted, limited to the following issue:

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18443. Robin S. Schwartz, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Robert S. Bello and Thomas M. Cassone, in opposition. Decided September 9, 2009

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting evidence of a transfer of property for less than fair value as evidence of consciousness of guilt and that such admission of evidence was not harmless?”

State v. Coccomo, 978 A.2d 1111, 293 Conn. 909, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 435 (Colo. 2009).

Pincite

978 A.2d 1111 (State v. Coccomo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related