Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Coccomo

State v. Coccomo

978 A.2d 1111, 293 Conn. 909, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 435
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 9, 2009
DocketSC 18443
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 978 A.2d 1111 (State v. Coccomo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Coccomo, 978 A.2d 1111, 293 Conn. 909, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 435 (Colo. 2009).

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 115 Conn. [910]*910App. 384 (AC 28819), is granted, limited to the following issue:

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18443. Robin S. Schwartz, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Robert S. Bello and Thomas M. Cassone, in opposition. Decided September 9, 2009
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting evidence of a transfer of property for less than fair value as evidence of consciousness of guilt and that such admission of evidence was not harmless?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Coccomo
31 A.3d 1012 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
978 A.2d 1111, 293 Conn. 909, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-coccomo-conn-2009.