State v. Cobenais

194 N.W.2d 189, 292 Minn. 441, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1327
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJanuary 7, 1972
DocketNo. 42576
StatusPublished

This text of 194 N.W.2d 189 (State v. Cobenais) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Cobenais, 194 N.W.2d 189, 292 Minn. 441, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1327 (Mich. 1972).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

Defendant, together with his younger brother and sister, solicited a ride with the owner of an automobile and thereafter the automobile was taken from the owner at knife point. The younger brother wielded the knife, but defendant assisted in retrieving it as it fell from his brother’s hand, thus thwarting the victim’s effort to get it. Although charged with aggravated robbery, defendant was convicted only of simple robbery. In his appeal from the judgment of conviction, defendant asserts that the evidence was insufficient to establish that a robbery occurred and that he intentionally participated in the crime. The appeal is without merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 N.W.2d 189, 292 Minn. 441, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cobenais-minn-1972.