State v. Cobble
755 S.W.2d 28, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 1119, 1988 WL 82744
Opinion
[29]*29ORDER
Defendant appeals from his conviction of driving while intoxicated. We affirm pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Cobble, 755 S.W.2d 28, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 1119, 1988 WL 82744 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988).
755 S.W.2d 28 (State v. Cobble) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.