State v. Cobb
This text of 515 A.2d 1156 (State v. Cobb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
Having entered a conditional guilty plea in Superior Court, Penobscot County, pursuant to M.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2), the defendant, David N. Cobb, appeals his convictions of illegal possession of moose meat, 12 M.R.S.A. § 7464(2) (1981) (Class D), and trafficking in marijuana, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1103 (1983) (Class C), contending that the trial court erred in refusing to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant issued on information obtained as a result of an improper search. We affirm the judgment.
The propriety of the warden’s conduct in obtaining information concerning activity within the defendant’s curtilage is governed by our recent decision in State v. Bridges, 513 A.2d 1365 (Me.1986).
We do not address the other issues the defendant raises on appeal because he did not bring them in a timely manner to the attention of the court and the state at the trial level. State v. Thornton, 485 A.2d 952 (Me.1984); State v. Desjardins, 401 A.2d 165, 169 (Me.1979).
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
515 A.2d 1156, 1986 Me. LEXIS 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cobb-me-1986.