State v. Cobalco

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Cobalco

896 S.W.2d 543, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 793, 1995 WL 237344

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 25, 1995·No. Nos. WD 47422, WD 49338·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Consolidated appeal from convictions by a jury of two counts of selling a controlled substance, § 195.211, RSMo 1994, one count of possessing a controlled substance with intent to sell, § 195.211, RSMo 1994, and one count of possessing a controlled substance, § 195.202, RSMo 1994, and from the denial of a Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.

Affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Consolidated appeal from convictions by a jury of two counts of selling a controlled substance, § 195.211, RSMo 1994, one count of possessing a controlled substance with intent to sell, § 195.211, RSMo 1994, and one count of possessing a controlled substance, § 195.202, RSMo 1994, and from the denial of a Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.

Affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

State v. Cobalco, 896 S.W.2d 543, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 793, 1995 WL 237344 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

896 S.W.2d 543 (State v. Cobalco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.