Home/Supreme Court of Louisiana/State v. Coats

State v. Coats

255 So. 2d 75, 260 La. 64, 1971 La. LEXIS 3873
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedNovember 23, 1971
Docket51375
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 255 So. 2d 75 (State v. Coats) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Coats, 255 So. 2d 75, 260 La. 64, 1971 La. LEXIS 3873 (La. 1971).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Dornell Coats, pleaded guilty to two counts of simple burglary (R.S. 14:62) and was sentenced to five years on each count, the sentences to run concurrently. He appeals those convictions and sentences.

The Louisiana Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction in criminal cases “in which the penalty of death or imprisonment at hard labor may be imposed.” (Emphasis added). La.Const. of 1921, Art. 7, Sec. 10(5). Code of Criminal Procedure Article 912 provides in part.

“A. Only a final judgment or ruling is appealable.
"B. * * *
“C. The judgments or rulings from which the defendant may appeal include, but are not limited to:
“(1) A judgment which imposes sentence ;”

Our cases consistently hold that a defendant can appeal from a conviction and sentence. Code of Criminal Procedure Article 934(3) provides: “ ‘Convicted’ means adjudicated guilty after a plea or after trial on the merits.” Code of Criminal Procedure Article 871 states in part: “A sentence is the penalty imposed by the court on a defendant upon a plea of guilty, upon a verdict of guilty, or upon a judgment of guilty.” A defendant is convicted by his plea of guilty, and he is sentenced when the penalty is imposed. Therefore he may appeal his conviction and sentence flowing from a plea of guilty. State v. Watson, 41 La.Ann. 598, 7 So. 125 (1889); State v. Bergeron, 152 La. 38, 92 So. 726 (1922).

However, a plea of guilty waives all defects prior to that plea except those jurisdictional defects which appear on the face of the pleadings and proceedings. State v. Valentine, decided November 8, 1971, 259 La. 1019, 254 So.2d 450. See also State v. Bergeron and State v. Watson, supra. We find no jurisdictional error prior to the guilty plea.

*67 No bills of exception were reserved or perfected. We are therefore limited on appeal to a review of the pleadings and proceedings for discoverable error. La.C. Cr.P. Art. 920. Examination of the pleadings and proceedings shows no error.

The convictions and sentences are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Williams
77 So. 3d 394 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2011)
State v. Fontenot
535 So. 2d 433 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1988)
State v. Spurgeon
437 So. 2d 981 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1983)
State v. Jones
404 So. 2d 1192 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1981)
State v. Crosby
338 So. 2d 584 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1976)
State v. Bell
332 So. 2d 222 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1976)
State v. Spain
329 So. 2d 178 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1976)
State v. Riley
284 So. 2d 557 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1973)
Hoyt v. State
273 So. 2d 528 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1973)
State v. Allen
267 So. 2d 544 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1972)
State v. Miles
260 So. 2d 661 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1972)
State v. Judson
258 So. 2d 864 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1972)
State ex rel. Bakke v. Henderson
256 So. 2d 638 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1972)
State v. James
256 So. 2d 430 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1972)
State v. Jackson
255 So. 2d 60 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 So. 2d 75, 260 La. 64, 1971 La. LEXIS 3873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-coats-la-1971.