State v. Clevinger
This text of 14 Ind. 366 (State v. Clevinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An affidavit was filed before a justice of the peace, charging Clevinger with having “maliciously injured a toll-gate, the property of the Walnut-street Turnpike Company, of the value of five dollars, by then and there taking the same down off the hinges, to the damage of said turnpike company,” &c.
Before the justice, the defendant was fined; and-in the [367]*367Court of Common Pleas, a motion was made by defendant, and sustained, to dismiss the case because of the insufficiency of the affidavit.
It is insisted that the affidavit does not sufficiently aver the specific injury done; and we are referred to Aydelott v. The State, 7 Blackf. 157, and Jackson v. The State, 7 Ind. R. 270. The authorities cited do not appear to us to sustain the position assumed by the appellee. Here the injury is stated, namely, removing the gate from its hinges. The amount of the injury thereby caused was another question—one of fact—to be determined upon the evidence and circumstances attending the act.
The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 Ind. 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-clevinger-ind-1860.