State v. Cleveland

152 N.W. 819, 161 Wis. 457, 1915 Wisc. LEXIS 239
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 16, 1915
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 152 N.W. 819 (State v. Cleveland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Cleveland, 152 N.W. 819, 161 Wis. 457, 1915 Wisc. LEXIS 239 (Wis. 1915).

Opinions

Tbe following opinion was filed June 1, 1915:

Winslow, C. J.

Tbe three defendants constitute tbe board of supervisors of tbe town of City Point, Jackson county. An information charging them with malfeasance in office was quashed by tbe trial court and tbe state prosecutes a writ of error to reverse tbe ruling. Tbe question presented is whether it is a criminal offense under sec. 4549, Stats. 1913, for one of tbe members of such a board to furnish a team and conveyance for tbe purpose of conveying tbe members of tbe board to and from their town board meetings, or to present a bill for tbe same to tbe board, or for the board to allow and pay tbe bill.

Upon tbe authority of Menasha W. W. Co. v. Winter, 159 Wis. 437, 150 N. W. 526, this question must be answered in tbe negative. In that case it was held that tbe section prohibited a public officer from having an interest in tbe purchase or sale of property or things in action or in any contract, proposal, or bid in relation to tbe same, and that tbe performing of services for tbe town would not be construed as coming within its meaning.

As said in that case, tbe statute is highly penal. Tbe furnishing of a conveyance to attend a board meeting or to enable the board to transact necessary official duties is clearly not the purchase or sale of property or things in action, nor is it a contract, proposal, or bid in relation thereto. It is rather in tbe nature of labor or services. Hogan v. Cushing, 49 Wis. 169, 5 N. W. 490.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Kort
194 N.W.2d 682 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1972)
State v. Konkol
266 N.W. 174 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1936)
Brenner v. Heruben
176 N.W. 228 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1920)
Outagamie County v. Zuehlke
161 N.W. 6 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 N.W. 819, 161 Wis. 457, 1915 Wisc. LEXIS 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cleveland-wis-1915.