State v. Cleveland

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Laquavius T. Cleveland, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2014-001842

Appeal From Oconee County Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-324 Submitted April 1, 2016 – Filed June 22, 2016

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General David A. Spencer, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Christina Theos Adams, of Anderson, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Griffin, 339 S.C. 74, 77, 528 S.E.2d 668, 669 (2000) ("[A]n in limine ruling is not final and does not preserve the issue for appeal."); State v. Schumpert, 312 S.C. 502, 507, 435 S.E.2d 859, 862 (1993) ("Unless an objection is made at the time the evidence is offered and a final ruling made, the issue is not preserved for review.").

AFFIRMED.1

HUFF, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.