State v. Clendinin
This text of 221 S.E.2d 71 (State v. Clendinin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These are appeals by the state from orders of acquittal entered by the trial court under Code § 27-1901, which requires that action when a defendant is not tried within two terms of court when demand for trial is made and juries are empaneled. Held:
Code Ann. § 6-1001 (a) must be construed strictly against the state in allowing appeals under the specific conditions provided by the General Assembly. State v. Holloman, 132 Ga. App. 304 (208 SE2d 167). Under the above statute an appeal by the state is authorized from: (a) An order setting aside or dismissing an indictment or information or any count thereof; (b) from an order arresting a judgment of conviction on legal grounds; (c) from an order sustaining a plea or motion in bar, when the defendant has not been put in jeopardy; and (d) from an order sustaining a motion to suppress illegally seized evidence made and ruled upon prior to the empaneling of a jury. An order discharging and acquitting a defendant under Code § 27-1901 does not fall within any of the above appealable judgments. The appeals must be dismissed. State v. Warren, 133 Ga. App. 793, 796 (213 SE2d 53).
Appeals dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
221 S.E.2d 71, 136 Ga. App. 303, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-clendinin-gactapp-1975.