State v. Clements

28 S.C.L. 48
CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedNovember 15, 1842
StatusPublished

This text of 28 S.C.L. 48 (State v. Clements) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Clements, 28 S.C.L. 48 (S.C. Ct. App. 1842).

Opinion

Curia, per

Evans, J.

If the question here presented were a new case, it might be doubtful, since the decision of the State vs. Schroder, 3 Hill, 62, whether it be necessary to allege that the mother of the bastard was a white woman. But the same question was made and decided expressly, in the case of the State vs. Clark, 2 Brevard, 386, and we think it better to let a decision stand, although its correctness may be somewhat doubtful. It is easy to conform, and departures from adjudicated cases might lead to great uncertainties in the law.

Richardson, O’Neall, Butler and Wardlaw, JJ. concurred. Earle, J., dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 S.C.L. 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-clements-scctapp-1842.