State v. Clayton

Supreme Court of Missouri

State v. Clayton

172 S.W. 1198, 263 Mo. 284, 1915 Mo. LEXIS 147

Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided January 4, 1915·Published

Opinion

ROY, C.

Defendant was charged under indictment with escaping from an officer having him in custody on a charge of grand larceny. He was convicted by a jury and his punishment assessed at two years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary. No hill of exceptions was ever filed in the case.

The indictment, verdict, judgment and other portions of the record offered are all regular and sufficient. Finding no error therein, the judgment is affirmed.

Williams, C., concurs.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of Roy, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court.

All of the judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROY, C.

Defendant was charged under indictment with escaping from an officer having him in custody on a charge of grand larceny. He was convicted by a jury and his punishment assessed at two years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary. No hill of exceptions was ever filed in the case.

The indictment, verdict, judgment and other portions of the record offered are all regular and sufficient. Finding no error therein, the judgment is affirmed.

Williams, C., concurs.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of Roy, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court.

All of the judges concur.

State v. Clayton, 172 S.W. 1198, 263 Mo. 284, 1915 Mo. LEXIS 147 (Mo. 1915).

Pincite

172 S.W. 1198 (State v. Clayton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.