State v. Clay

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Clay

999 N.E.2d 702, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1449

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 26, 2013

Docket2013-1038

StatusPublished

This text of 999 N.E.2d 702 (State v. Clay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Clay, 999 N.E.2d 702, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1449 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. The records of this court indicate that relator has not filed a merit brief, due October 21, 2013, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence.

Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. The records of this court indicate that relator has not filed a merit brief, due October 21, 2013, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence.

Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

999 N.E.2d 702, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-clay-ohio-2013.