State v. Clay

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Clay

999 N.E.2d 702, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1449

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 26, 2013·No. 2013-1038·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. The records of this court indicate that relator has not filed a merit brief, due October 21, 2013, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence.

Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. The records of this court indicate that relator has not filed a merit brief, due October 21, 2013, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence.

Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed.

State v. Clay, 999 N.E.2d 702, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1449 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

999 N.E.2d 702 (State v. Clay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.