State v. Clay

878 N.E.2d 33, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1456
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 26, 2007·No. 2007-1852·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 88823, 2007-Ohio-4295. Discretionary appeal accepted and cause consolidated with 2007-1802, State v. Clay, Cuyahoga App. No. 88823, 2007-Ohio-4295

Cupp, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I only. O’Donnell, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Clay, 878 N.E.2d 33, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1456 (Ohio 2007).

878 N.E.2d 33 (State v. Clay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McIntosh v. Slick
880 N.E.2d 94 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)