State v. Clay

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Clay

878 N.E.2d 32, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1454

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 26, 2007

Docket2007-1802

StatusPublished

This text of 878 N.E.2d 32 (State v. Clay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Clay, 878 N.E.2d 32, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1454 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 88823, 2007-Ohio-4295. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed September 12, 2007:

“Whether knowledge of the pending indictment is required for a conviction for having a weapon while under disability pursuant to R.C. 2923.13(A)(3) when the disability is based on a pending indictment.”

O’Donnell, J., dissents.

The conflict case is State v. Burks (June 22, 1990), Sandusky App. No. S-89-13.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2007-1852, State v. Clay, Cuyahoga App. No. 88823, 2007-Ohio-4295.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI