State v. Clay
571 A.2d 295, 118 N.J. 251, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 26
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 230 N.J.Super. 509, 553 A.2d 1356 (1989).
For affirmance Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.
Opposed — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Clay, 571 A.2d 295, 118 N.J. 251, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 26 (N.J. 1990).
571 A.2d 295 (State v. Clay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State of New Jersey in the Interest of Juvenile, I.C.
146 A.3d 1245 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2016)
State of New Jersey v. Anthony F. Stalter
114 A.3d 1029 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2015)
State of New Jersey v. Christoph F. Adams
92 A.3d 675 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2014)
Commonwealth v. Wegley
791 A.2d 1223 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2002)
State v. Black
710 A.2d 428 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1998)
State v. Belnavis
709 A.2d 805 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1998)
State v. Haliski
656 A.2d 1246 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1995)
State v. Kline
649 A.2d 1379 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1994)
State v. Kyc
617 A.2d 1245 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)
State v. Cannon
608 A.2d 341 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1992)
Miller v. Zoby
595 A.2d 1104 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1991)