State v. Clarkson
This text of 553 S.E.2d 450 (State v. Clarkson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Respondent was indicted for assault with intent to commit criminal sexual conduct against a minor in the second degree (ACSC) and pled guilty to assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature (ABHAN). The Court of Appeals vacated his guilty plea. State v. Clarkson, 337 S.C. 518, 523 S.E.2d 817 (Ct.App.1999). The State has filed a petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of the Court of Appeals’ opinion. We grant the petition for a writ of certiorari, dispense with further briefing and reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.
Relying on its opinion in State v. Elliott, 335 S.C. 512, 517 S.E.2d 713 (Ct.App.1999), the Court of Appeals determined respondent’s guilty plea should be vacated because ABHAN is not a lesser-included offense of ACSC. This Court recently reversed the decision of the Court of Appeals in Elliott and held that ABHAN is a lesser-included offense of ACSC. State v. Elliott, Op. No. 25356, 552 S.E.2d 727 (S.C.Sup.Ct.2001). Accordingly, the Court of Appeals erred in vacating respondent’s guilty plea.
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
553 S.E.2d 450, 347 S.C. 115, 2001 S.C. LEXIS 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-clarkson-sc-2001.