State v. . Clarke

17 S.E.2d 468, 220 N.C. 392, 1941 N.C. LEXIS 546
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 19, 1941·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

DeviN, J.

The statute under which the defendant was tried provides that, “Any parent who willfully neglects or who refuses to support and *393 maintain bis or ber illegitimate child shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to such penalties as are hereinafter provided.”

"Willfulness is one of the essential elements of the offense. This must be charged in the warrant, S. v. Cook, 207 N. C., 261, 176 S. E., 757; S. v. Spillman, 210 N. C., 271, 186 S. E., 322. Its omission is not cured by C. S., 4623, S. v. Tyson, 208 N. C., 231, 180 S. E., 85, or by amendment after verdict, S. v. Tarlton, 208 N. C., 734, 182 S. E., 481; S. v. McLamb, 214 N. C., 322, 199 S. E., 81.

The record in this case is not sufficient to support the judgment.

As the warrant fails to charge an offense under the statute, questions relating to the interpretation of other provisions of the statute are not presented or decided.

Error and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Clarke, 17 S.E.2d 468, 220 N.C. 392, 1941 N.C. LEXIS 546 (N.C. 1941).

17 S.E.2d 468 (State v. . Clarke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Coppedge
94 S.E.2d 569 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
State v. Ferguson
92 S.E.2d 197 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
State v. Moore
78 S.E.2d 914 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
State v. Doughtie
77 S.E.2d 642 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Lovegrove v. Lovegrove
74 S.E.2d 723 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
State v. . Morgan
38 S.E.2d 166 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946)
State v. . Vanderlip
35 S.E.2d 885 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1945)
State v. . Allen
31 S.E.2d 530 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)