State v. Clark
This text of 252 A.2d 720 (State v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment appealed from is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate *26 Division. 105 N. J. Super. 381 (1968). In the event the defendant wishes to attack his administrative transfer to the State Prison Farm, Rahway, as an abuse of discretion, he may do so by an affirmative showing in an independent proceeding under B. B. 4:88-8. See State v. Miles, 87 N. J. Super. 571, 585-586 (Law Div. 1965), affirmed, 94 N. J. Super. 169 (App. Div. 1967).
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintbaub and Justices Jacobs, Feancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and Hane-MAET - 7.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 A.2d 720, 54 N.J. 25, 1969 N.J. LEXIS 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-clark-nj-1969.