State v. Clark

551 S.E.2d 108, 353 N.C. 730
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided July 19, 2001·No. 314P01·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

551 S.E.2d 108 (2001)
353 N.C. 730

STATE of North Carolina
v.
Elizabeth Magdelene CLARK a/k/a, Robin Gosnell.

No. 314P01.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 19, 2001.

Robin Gosnell, Pro Se.

William N. Farrell, Jr., Senior Deputy Attorney General, William D. Kenerly, District Attorney, for State.

Prior report: 138 N.C.App. 392, 531 S.E.2d 482.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant Pro Se in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th day of July 2001."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Clark, 551 S.E.2d 108, 353 N.C. 730 (N.C. 2001).

551 S.E.2d 108 (State v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McPhail
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014
State v. Glasco
585 S.E.2d 257 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2003)
State v. Santiago
557 S.E.2d 601 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2001)
State v. Butler
556 S.E.2d 304 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2001)