State v. Clark

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Clark

545 S.W.3d 880

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Clark. Read the opinion of the Court — 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 390 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 13, 2018·No. No. ED 105347·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Vance R. Clark appeals from the trial court's judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of three counts of distribution of a controlled substance, two counts of possession of a controlled substance, and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Vance R. Clark appeals from the trial court's judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of three counts of distribution of a controlled substance, two counts of possession of a controlled substance, and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

State v. Clark, 545 S.W.3d 880 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

545 S.W.3d 880 (State v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.