State v. Clark

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Clark

338 S.W.3d 881, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 536, 2011 WL 1465569

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 19, 2011

DocketWD 71731

StatusPublished

This text of 338 S.W.3d 881 (State v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Clark, 338 S.W.3d 881, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 536, 2011 WL 1465569 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Roger Clark appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of one count of first-degree statutory sodomy, section 566.062, after a jury trial. He contends the trial court erred in sustaining the State’s pretrial motion in limine to exclude evidence relating to the victim.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Roger Clark appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of one count of first-degree statutory sodomy, section 566.062, after a jury trial. He contends the trial court erred in sustaining the State’s pretrial motion in limine to exclude evidence relating to the victim.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

338 S.W.3d 881, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 536, 2011 WL 1465569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-clark-moctapp-2011.