State v. Clark

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Clark

338 S.W.3d 881, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 536, 2011 WL 1465569

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Clark. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1714 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 19, 2011·No. WD 71731·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Roger Clark appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of one count of first-degree statutory sodomy, section 566.062, after a jury trial. He contends the trial court erred in sustaining the State’s pretrial motion in limine to exclude evidence relating to the victim.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Roger Clark appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of one count of first-degree statutory sodomy, section 566.062, after a jury trial. He contends the trial court erred in sustaining the State’s pretrial motion in limine to exclude evidence relating to the victim.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Clark, 338 S.W.3d 881, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 536, 2011 WL 1465569 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

338 S.W.3d 881 (State v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.