State v. Clark

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Clark

519 So. 2d 103, 1988 La. LEXIS 133, 1988 WL 5310

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 29, 1988

DocketNo. 87-KK-1590

StatusPublished

This text of 519 So. 2d 103 (State v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Clark, 519 So. 2d 103, 1988 La. LEXIS 133, 1988 WL 5310 (La. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Writ granted. The stipulation regarding child support payments entered by the defendant must be invalidated, as defendant was neither represented by counsel nor advised of his right to have counsel appointed for him if he could not afford one. State v. St. Pierre, 515 So.2d 769, 774-775 (La. 1987). Defendant’s motion to quash the

[104]*104petition for contempt is accordingly granted. This case is remanded, in accordance with the procedures outlined in State v. St. Pierre, supra, at 775-776.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Writ granted. The stipulation regarding child support payments entered by the defendant must be invalidated, as defendant was neither represented by counsel nor advised of his right to have counsel appointed for him if he could not afford one. State v. St. Pierre, 515 So.2d 769, 774-775 (La. 1987). Defendant’s motion to quash the

[104]*104petition for contempt is accordingly granted. This case is remanded, in accordance with the procedures outlined in State v. St. Pierre, supra, at 775-776.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

519 So. 2d 103, 1988 La. LEXIS 133, 1988 WL 5310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-clark-la-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack