State v. Clark
380 So. 2d 1209, 1980 La. LEXIS 6790
Opinion
Having reviewed all the assignments of error filed by the defendant, we find that they present no reversible merit and do not require published explanation because they do not present any question of unsettled law. Therefore, these assignments are discussed in an unpublished, but publicly recorded, appendix to this opinion.
The defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Chief Judge Paul B. Landry, Jr., Retired, participated in this decision as an Associate Justice Ad Hoc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Clark, 380 So. 2d 1209, 1980 La. LEXIS 6790 (La. 1980).
380 So. 2d 1209 (State v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Palm Court, Inc. v. Durham
45 Fla. Supp. 2d 196 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1991)