State v. Clark

33 N.W. 340, 72 Iowa 30
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided June 16, 1887·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Reed, J.

The defendant moved in arrest of judgment on the ground that the indictment did not charge a criminal offense. The indictment charges that defendant, by means of a certain false token and certain false pretenses, induced E. M. Jackson to sign a written instrument, the false making of which would be forgery. There is no averment in the indictment, - however, that he obtained from Jackson the .instrument so signed by him. In the case of State v. McGinnis, 71 Iowa, 685, we held that an indictment in substantially the same form was not sufficient. Following that holding, the judgment should be

REVERSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Clark, 33 N.W. 340, 72 Iowa 30 (iowa 1887).

33 N.W. 340 (State v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Waterman
29 Nev. 288 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1907)