State v. Clanton

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Clanton

958 So. 2d 1179, 2007 La. LEXIS 1439, 2007 WL 2076966

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 15, 2007·No. No. 2006-KP-1993·Published

Opinion

In re Clanton, David; — Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 401451; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2006 KW 0627.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied. The district court is directed to conform the minutes to the verdicts actually returned by the trial judge as reflected in the transcript and to reconcile the exact terms of the defendant’s sentence with respect to his eligibility for what was referred to in the minute entry as “eight-to-four” or early release. See State v. Lynch, 441 So.2d 732, 734 (La.1983); State v. Godejohn, 425 So.2d 750, 751 n. (La.1983).

JOHNSON, J., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Clanton, David; — Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 401451; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2006 KW 0627.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied. The district court is directed to conform the minutes to the verdicts actually returned by the trial judge as reflected in the transcript and to reconcile the exact terms of the defendant’s sentence with respect to his eligibility for what was referred to in the minute entry as “eight-to-four” or early release. See State v. Lynch, 441 So.2d 732, 734 (La.1983); State v. Godejohn, 425 So.2d 750, 751 n. (La.1983).

JOHNSON, J., would deny.

State v. Clanton, 958 So. 2d 1179, 2007 La. LEXIS 1439, 2007 WL 2076966 (La. 2007).

Pincite

958 So. 2d 1179 (State v. Clanton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related