State v. City of Passaic

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. City of Passaic

23 A. 945, 54 N.J.L. 340, 25 Vroom 340, 1892 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 75

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedFebruary 15, 1892

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 23 A. 945 (State v. City of Passaic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. City of Passaic, 23 A. 945, 54 N.J.L. 340, 25 Vroom 340, 1892 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 75 (N.J. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garrison, J.

I. The cases of New Jersey Railroad and Transportation Company v. City of Elizabeth, 8 Vroom 330, and Jersey City ads. New Jersey Midland Railroad Company, 13 Id. 97, are authority for the proposition that the road-bed of a railway company is property legally subject to assessment for municipal benefits.

II. By the report of the commissioners we are apprised that ¡actual benefit has been conferred upon the property of the prosecutor. The proofs taken under this writ do not over•come the report in this respect. We assume, therefore, that the prosecutor has received benefits and is liable to be assessed; therefore, if any question could be raised upon the proofs it would be as to the precise amount and value of the benefit so received; in respect to which the prosecutor contends that its ¡assessment is ^excessive. Where the commissioners had been ■upon the ground, and do not appear to have followed any ¡erroneous rule in estimating benefits, this court is disinclined [342]*342to substitute for the report thus rendered its own speculative- ' estimate based upon mere affidavits. The question, however,. • does not arise in the case before us, as in none of the reasons-filed is there any complaint made of the amount of the assessment.

The assessment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garrison, J.

I. The cases of New Jersey Railroad and Transportation Company v. City of Elizabeth, 8 Vroom 330, and Jersey City ads. New Jersey Midland Railroad Company, 13 Id. 97, are authority for the proposition that the road-bed of a railway company is property legally subject to assessment for municipal benefits.

II. By the report of the commissioners we are apprised that ¡actual benefit has been conferred upon the property of the prosecutor. The proofs taken under this writ do not over•come the report in this respect. We assume, therefore, that the prosecutor has received benefits and is liable to be assessed; therefore, if any question could be raised upon the proofs it would be as to the precise amount and value of the benefit so received; in respect to which the prosecutor contends that its ¡assessment is ^excessive. Where the commissioners had been ■upon the ground, and do not appear to have followed any ¡erroneous rule in estimating benefits, this court is disinclined [342]*342to substitute for the report thus rendered its own speculative- ' estimate based upon mere affidavits. The question, however,. • does not arise in the case before us, as in none of the reasons-filed is there any complaint made of the amount of the assessment.

The assessment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A. 945, 54 N.J.L. 340, 25 Vroom 340, 1892 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-city-of-passaic-nj-1892.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack