State v. City of Dunedin

180 So. 24, 131 Fla. 857, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1495
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 31, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 180 So. 24 (State v. City of Dunedin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. City of Dunedin, 180 So. 24, 131 Fla. 857, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1495 (Fla. 1938).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from a final decree validating a single issue of refunding bonds to take the place of seven series of bonds previously issued by the Town and City of Dunedin. It is contended that the provisions of the issuing resolution are not sufficiently definite to bind the homesteads in the City if they can be bound for the refunding bonds, that the territory of the City has several times been changed and that the refunding bonds being against territory different from the territory securing the original bonds, the security is different and that consequently the refunding bonds cannot be issued without an approving vote of the people.

*858 We have carefully examined each of these contentions and find them to be without merit. It further appears from the record that the refunding bonds were issued in compliance with the requirements of the law and being so, the final decree appealed from is affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports, 1979
Fahs v. Kilgore
187 So. 170 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 So. 24, 131 Fla. 857, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-city-of-dunedin-fla-1938.