State v. City & County of Denver

139 P.3d 635, 2006 Colo. LEXIS 492
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedJune 5, 2006
DocketNos. 04SA396, 05SA22
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 139 P.3d 635 (State v. City & County of Denver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. City & County of Denver, 139 P.3d 635, 2006 Colo. LEXIS 492 (Colo. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Chief Justice Mullarkey, Justice Hobbs, and Justice Martinez are of the opinion that the judgments of the trial courts in State of Colorado v. City and County of Denver, case number 03CV3809, and in Sternberg v. City and County of Denver, case number 03CV8609, should be affirmed; whereas Justice Bender, Justice Rice, and Justice Coats are of the opinion that the judgments should be reversed. Justice Eid does not participate.

Because the court is equally divided, the judgments of the trial courts in State of Colorado v. City and County of Denver, case number 03CV3809, and in Sternberg v. City and County of Denver, case number 03CV8609, are affirmed by operation of law. See C.A.R. 35(e).

Justice EID does not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. City and County of Denver
139 P.3d 635 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 P.3d 635, 2006 Colo. LEXIS 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-city-county-of-denver-colo-2006.