State v. Cincinnati Police Dept

122 N.E.3d 1287, 2019 Ohio 2012, 155 Ohio St. 3d 1465
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 24, 2019·No. 2017-1618·Published

Opinion

MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS

Sua sponte, respondent ordered to submit supplemental evidence in the form of an affidavit that indicates whether the responding officers, whose images were intentionally obscured when the bodycam footage was released to relator, were in fact acting in a capacity that exempts their identity from disclosure either at the time of the incident or at any other time. The evidence shall be submitted within seven days. Relator may file a written response addressing the supplemental evidence within seven days of the date of the filing of the supplemental evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Cincinnati Police Dept, 122 N.E.3d 1287, 2019 Ohio 2012, 155 Ohio St. 3d 1465 (Ohio 2019).

122 N.E.3d 1287 (State v. Cincinnati Police Dept) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.