State v. Cincinnati Police Dept

122 N.E.3d 1287, 2019 Ohio 2012, 155 Ohio St. 3d 1465
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 24, 2019
Docket2017-1618
StatusPublished

This text of 122 N.E.3d 1287 (State v. Cincinnati Police Dept) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Cincinnati Police Dept, 122 N.E.3d 1287, 2019 Ohio 2012, 155 Ohio St. 3d 1465 (Ohio 2019).

Opinion

MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS

Sua sponte, respondent ordered to submit supplemental evidence in the form of an affidavit that indicates whether the responding officers, whose images were intentionally obscured when the bodycam footage was released to relator, were in fact acting in a capacity that exempts their identity from disclosure either at the time of the incident or at any other time. The evidence shall be submitted within seven days. Relator may file a written response addressing the supplemental evidence within seven days of the date of the filing of the supplemental evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 N.E.3d 1287, 2019 Ohio 2012, 155 Ohio St. 3d 1465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cincinnati-police-dept-ohio-2019.