State v. Cianci

113 A.2d 176, 18 N.J. 191, 1955 N.J. LEXIS 246
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 28, 1955·Published·Cited by 20 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Oliphant, Wachenfeld, Jacobs and Brennan — 5. For reversal — Justices Heiler and Burling — 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Cianci, 113 A.2d 176, 18 N.J. 191, 1955 N.J. LEXIS 246 (N.J. 1955).

113 A.2d 176 (State v. Cianci) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Orlando
634 A.2d 1039 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1993)
State v. Subin
536 A.2d 758 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1988)
State v. Jones
517 A.2d 1219 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1986)
State v. Rodriguez
478 A.2d 408 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1984)
State v. Sanchez
183 N.J. Super. 391 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1982)
State v. James
397 A.2d 1113 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
Dorfman v. State
351 So. 2d 954 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
State v. Vaccaro
375 A.2d 1221 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)
State v. Rowe
354 A.2d 701 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
State v. Green
322 A.2d 495 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1974)
State v. Rullis
191 A.2d 197 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1963)
State v. Buffa
168 A.2d 49 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
State v. Wines
167 A.2d 650 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
State v. Corby
136 A.2d 271 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Worbetz v. Goodman
136 A.2d 1 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
State v. Quatro
129 A.2d 741 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
State v. Hill
129 A.2d 752 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
State v. Stephenson
125 A.2d 157 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)