State v. Church

2000 WI 90, 613 N.W.2d 848, 236 Wis. 2d 755, 2000 Wisc. LEXIS 432
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 11, 2000
Docket97-3140-CR
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 2000 WI 90 (State v. Church) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Church, 2000 WI 90, 613 N.W.2d 848, 236 Wis. 2d 755, 2000 Wisc. LEXIS 432 (Wis. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1. The State petitioned for review of the decision of the court of appeals, State v. Church, 223 Wis. 2d 641, 589 N.W.2d 638 (Ct. App. 1998), reversing a judgment of conviction of the Circuit Court for Dane County, Sarah B. O'Brien, Judge. The conviction was for two counts of child enticement, one a *756 violation of Wis. Stat. § 948.07(3) and the other a violation of Wis. Stat. § 948.07(6), based on one act of causing a child to enter a hotel.

¶ 2. The court of appeals reversed the conviction. It held that the two counts were multiplicitous "because Wis. Stat. § 948.07 does not permit multiple punishments for one act of enticement simply because the defendant intended multiple misdeeds, rather than a single misdeed, with the victim." 223 Wis. 2d at 645-46.

¶ 3. The State argued in the court of appeals, in its petition for review and in its briefs to this court, that Wis. Stat. § 948.07 creates multiple offenses that may be punished separately. At oral argument the State departed from its prior position. It argued that its interpretation of the child enticement statute advanced in State v. Derango, 2000 WI 89, 236 Wis. 2d 721, 613 N.W.2d 833, is correct, namely, that Wis. Stat. § 948.07 creates a single offense with alternative mental states that may be submitted to the jury without a requirement of unanimity.

¶ 4. The issue framed in the present case has been decided by this court in State v. Derango, of even date.

¶ 5. For the reasons set forth, we conclude that review in this case was improvidently granted, and we dismiss the petition for review.

By the Court. — The review of the decision of the court of appeals is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Heather L. Steinhardt
2017 WI 62 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2017)
State v. Church
2003 WI 74 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2003)
State v. Church
2002 WI App 212 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2002)
State v. Koenck
2001 WI App 93 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2001)
State v. Trawitzki
2000 WI App 205 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2000 WI 90, 613 N.W.2d 848, 236 Wis. 2d 755, 2000 Wisc. LEXIS 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-church-wis-2000.