State v. Church
This text of 2025 Ohio 5808 (State v. Church) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Church, 2025-Ohio-5808.]
COURT OF APPEALS GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
STATE OF OHIO Case No. 25CA000035
Plaintiff - Appellee Opinion And Judgment Entry
-vs- Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 23CR125 WILLIAM D. CHURCH Judgment: Dismissed Defendant – Appellant Date of Judgment Entry: December 29, 2025
BEFORE: Andrew J. King; Kevin W. Popham; David M. Gormley, Appellate Judges
APPEARANCES: WILLIAM D. CHURCH, PRO SE, for Defendant-Appellant.
King, J.
{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant William Church appeals the September 15, 2025
judgment of the Guernsey County Common Pleas Judge Daniel Padden which denied
Church's pro-se motion for Judge Padden to recuse himself from Church's case. We find
the Court of Common Pleas was without jurisdiction to act upon Church's motion, and
therefore this court is without jurisdiction to address Church's assignment of error.
{¶ 2} A trial court judge's denial of a motion to recuse is not an appealable order.
When an affiant alleges bias or prejudice as Church did here, the filing of an affidavit of
disqualification with the Ohio Supreme Court pursuant to R.C. 2701.03 is the exclusive
lawful means of seeking recusal of a judge. R.C. 2701.03(A) directs: (A) If a judge of the court of common pleas allegedly is interested in
a proceeding pending before the court, allegedly is related to or has
a bias or prejudice for or against a party to a proceeding pending
before the court or a party’s counsel, or allegedly otherwise is
disqualified to preside in a proceeding pending before the court, any
party to the proceeding or the party’s counsel may file an affidavit of
disqualification with the clerk of the supreme court in accordance with
division (B) of this section.
{¶ 3} On September 22, 2025, Church did file an affidavit of disqualification with
the Ohio Supreme Court. On Affidavit of Disqualification State of Ohio v. William D.
Church, 25-AP-144. On September 24, 2025, the Court found Church had failed to
establish that the underlying case was pending before Judge Padden and dismissed the
affidavit of disqualification. That being true, this court is also without jurisdiction to address
Church's appeal. Beer v. Griffith, 54 Ohio St.2d 440, 441-442 (1978). Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal. For the reasons stated in our accompanying Opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
Costs to Appellant.
By: King, P.J.
Popham, J. and
Gormley, J. concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2025 Ohio 5808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-church-ohioctapp-2025.