State v. Church

526 A.2d 950, 1987 Me. LEXIS 713
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJune 19, 1987
StatusPublished

This text of 526 A.2d 950 (State v. Church) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Church, 526 A.2d 950, 1987 Me. LEXIS 713 (Me. 1987).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Pursuant to M.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2) Donald Church entered a conditional plea of guilty in the Superior Court (Penobscot County) to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, reserving for appeal the question whether the District Court (Millinocket) erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence of his intoxication that a police officer gained as a result of stopping Church’s vehicle.

On this record we find no error in the District Court’s conclusion that the police officer relied on three reasons for stopping Church and at least two of them reasonably warranted that intrusion under the test of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). See State v. Chapman, 495 A.2d 314, 317 (Me.1985). Therefore, the entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Terry v. Ohio
392 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1968)
State v. Chapman
495 A.2d 314 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
526 A.2d 950, 1987 Me. LEXIS 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-church-me-1987.