State v. Chumpraphai

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Chumpraphai

375 S.W.3d 914, 2012 WL 3793003, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1091

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 4, 2012·No. No. WD 73953·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER-CURIAM.

Nicole Chumpraphai was convicted of possession of a controlled substance (clona-zepam) following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Pettis County. She appeals, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to support the guilty verdict. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER-CURIAM.

Nicole Chumpraphai was convicted of possession of a controlled substance (clona-zepam) following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Pettis County. She appeals, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to support the guilty verdict. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Chumpraphai, 375 S.W.3d 914, 2012 WL 3793003, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1091 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

375 S.W.3d 914 (State v. Chumpraphai) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.