State v. Christopher
This text of State v. Christopher (State v. Christopher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) v. ) ) I.D. Nos. 2109011557 ) 2105014511 DEANDRE J. CHRISTOPHER, ) 1912028570 ) 2005006266 Defendant. )
ORDER
Submitted: January 30, 2023 Decided: April 17, 2023
AND NOW TO WIT, this 17th day of April 2023, upon consideration of
Deandre J. Christopher (“Defendant”)’s Motion for Modification of Sentence
under Superior Court Criminal Rule 35, the sentence imposed upon the
Defendant, and the record in this case, it appears to the Court that:
1. On December 7, 2021, Defendant pled guilty to Stalking, Non-
Compliance with Bond Conditions (felony), Reckless Endangering Second Degree,
Offensive Touching, and Non-Compliance with Bond Conditions (unclassified).1 On
March 11, 2022, Defendant w as s e nt en c e d to : ( 1 ) f o r S t a lk in g , th r e e
y e a r s at Level V, suspended after nine months, for one year at Level III, with
GPS monitoring; (2) for Non-Compliance with Bond Conditions (felony), two years
at Level V, suspended for one year at Level II, with GPS monitoring; (3) Reckless
1 Crim. I.D. No. 2105014511, D.I. 3. Endangering Second Degree, one year at Level V, suspended after six months, for one
year at Level III, with GPS monitoring; (4) for Offensive Touching, thirty days at Level
V, suspended for one year at Level III, with GPS monitoring; and (5) for Non-
Compliance with Bond Conditions (unclassified), a fine in the amount of $500.00.2
2. On January 20, 2023, Defendant filed a Motion for Modification of
his Sentence asking the Court to remove GPS monitoring.3 In support of his
request, he asserts that removing a GPS monitoring condition will help him to be
able to succeed as a truck driver.4 The Court also received a letter from Jaden
McKinley, Director/CEO of American Driver Training Academy, Inc.,
commending Defendant’s performance in a re-entry program offered by the same
company through DOC. 5
3. The Court acknowledges and commends Defendant’s successful
performance in the transitioning program. Defendant's sentence, however, was
imposed pursuant to a Plea Agreement between the State and Defendant that
included conditions to include GPS monitoring. 6
4. Due to the nature of the charges—including Stalking and Non-
Compliance with Bond Conditions—the sentence was and remains appropriate for
2 Crim. I.D. No. 2105014511, D.I. 4. 3 Crim. I.D. No. 2105014511, D.I. 6. 4 Id. (explaining in detail that removing GPS monitoring will enable Defendant to participate in a six-week training program, drive interstate and intrastate, perform overnight driving assignments, and get new jobs). 5 Id. (attaching the letter from Jaden McKinley). 6 See Crim. I.D. No. 2105014511, D.I. 4. 2 all the reasons stated at the time of sentencing.
IT IS SO ORDERED that the Motion for Modification of Sentence is
DENIED.
/s/ Vivian L. Medinilla Vivian L. Medinilla Judge
oc: Prothonotary cc: Defendant Department of Justice Investigative Services Office
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Christopher, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-christopher-delsuperct-2023.