State v. Christie Thomas
This text of State v. Christie Thomas (State v. Christie Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
AT JACKSON FILED JUNE SESSION, 1999 July 12, 1999
Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) C.C.A. NO. 02C01-9810-CR-00303 ) Appellee, ) ) SHELBY COUNTY V. ) ) ) HON. CHRIS CRAFT, JUDGE CHR ISTIE T HOM AS, ) ) Appe llant. ) (ASSAUL T)
FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:
A. C. WHARTON PAUL G. SUMMERS District Public Defender Attorney General & Reporter
TONY M. BRAYTON R. STEPHEN JOBE Assistant Public Defender Assistant Attorney General Criminal Justice Center, Suite 201 2nd Floor, Cordell Hull Building 201 Poplar Avenue 425 Fifth Avenue North Memphis, TN 38103 Nashville, TN 37243
JOH N W. P IERO TTI District Attorn ey Ge neral
JERRY KITCHEN Assistant District Attorney General
DAN BYER Assistant District Attorney General Criminal Justice Center, Suite 301 201 Poplar Avenue Memphis, TN 38103
OPINION FILED ________________________
AFFIRMED PURSU ANT TO RU LE 20
THOMAS T. WOODALL, JUDGE ORDER In this case, the Defendant, Christie Thomas, has appealed as of right
from the trial court’s decision declining to grant her request for judicial diversion
pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-35-313. Upon a plea of nolo
contende re to the offense of misdemeanor assault, the Defendant was sentenced
to serve sixty (60) days, which was suspended, and was placed on probation for
eleven (1 1) mon ths, twenty -nine (29 ) days.
W e have reviewed the record and find that the trial court did not abuse
its discretion in declining to grant judicial divers ion to De fendan t pursua nt to
Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-35-313. The evidence does not
prepon derate against the finding of the trial judge, and no error of law requiring a
reversal of the judgment is apparent on the record. Accordingly, the judgment of the
trial court is affirmed in accordance with R ule 20 of the Court of Criminal Appeals of
Tennessee.
____________________________________ THOMAS T. W OODALL, Judge
CONCUR:
___________________________________ DAVID H. WELLES , Judge
___________________________________ NORMA McG EE OGLE, Judge
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Christie Thomas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-christie-thomas-tenncrimapp-1999.