State v. Christie
This text of 2019 ND 40 (State v. Christie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 2/21/19 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2019 ND40 ___
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Jeffery Allen Christie, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20180286
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable David E. Reich, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Marina Spahr, Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee.
Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, N.D., for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. State v. Christie No. 20180286
Per Curiam. [¶1] Jeffery Christie appeals from a criminal judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of class AA felony gross sexual imposition. Christie argues the evidence is legally insufficient to support the jury’s guilty verdict. Having reviewed the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and giving the verdict the benefit of all inferences reasonably to be drawn in its favor, see State v. White, 2017 ND 51, ¶ 17, 890 N.W.2d 825, we conclude the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict. We summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jon J. Jensen
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2019 ND 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-christie-nd-2019.