State v. Christie
Opinion
[¶1] Jeffery Christie appeals from a criminal judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of class AA felony gross sexual imposition. Christie argues the evidence is legally insufficient to support the jury's guilty verdict. Having reviewed the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and giving the verdict the benefit of all inferences reasonably to be drawn in its favor,
see
State v. White
,
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jerod E. Tufte
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jon J. Jensen
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2019 ND 40 (State v. Christie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.