State v. Christie
This text of 543 N.W.2d 372 (State v. Christie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the court of appeals filed September 19, 1995, 1995 WL 550947, affirming the conviction of Timothy Victor Christie of careless driving be, and the same is, affirmed. Christie contends that the revocation of his driver’s license pursuant to the implied consent law barred the subsequent criminal prosecution for DWI and careless driving under the double jeopardy clause. This contention is answered by our decision in State v. Hanson, 543 N.W.2d 84 (Minn.1996). The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.
BY THE COURT:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
543 N.W.2d 372, 1996 Minn. LEXIS 55, 1996 WL 50912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-christie-minn-1996.