State v. Christiansen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Christiansen

515 N.W.2d 576, 1994 Minn. LEXIS 318, 1994 WL 153766

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided April 19, 1994·No. No. C2-93-1165·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Kathi Ann Christiansen for further review be, and the same is, denied. However, we disagree with the court of appeals’ conclusion that the trial court properly refused to let defense counsel cross-examine an admitted but uncharged accomplice to the issue whether she had ever faced criminal charges as a result of her involvement. We believe that there was error but it was nonprejudicial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Kathi Ann Christiansen for further review be, and the same is, denied. However, we disagree with the court of appeals’ conclusion that the trial court properly refused to let defense counsel cross-examine an admitted but uncharged accomplice to the issue whether she had ever faced criminal charges as a result of her involvement. We believe that there was error but it was nonprejudicial.

State v. Christiansen, 515 N.W.2d 576, 1994 Minn. LEXIS 318, 1994 WL 153766 (Mich. 1994).

Pincite

515 N.W.2d 576 (State v. Christiansen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.