State v. Christian
This text of 593 P.2d 529 (State v. Christian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals his conviction for resisting arrest, challenging the imposition of a condition of probation that he make $133 restitution for a policeman’s watch which was destroyed or missing as a result of the crime. He contends that there was no proof of the extent of the property damage or that it was related to the crime.
Defendant having made such an objection in the lower court, a hearing was held. He assigns no error to anything occurring during that hearing (indeed, he fails to mention that it occurred) and makes no contention that the hearing was deficient.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
593 P.2d 529, 39 Or. App. 691, 1979 Ore. App. LEXIS 2185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-christian-orctapp-1979.