State v. Christian

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Christian

593 P.2d 529, 39 Or. App. 691, 1979 Ore. App. LEXIS 2185

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Christian. Read the opinion of the Court — 35 Or. App. 339 →

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided April 23, 1979·No. No. DA 155483, CA 12694·Published

Opinion

TANZER, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for resisting arrest, challenging the imposition of a condition of probation that he make $133 restitution for a policeman’s watch which was destroyed or missing as a result of the crime. He contends that there was no proof of the extent of the property damage or that it was related to the crime.

Defendant having made such an objection in the lower court, a hearing was held. He assigns no error to anything occurring during that hearing (indeed, he fails to mention that it occurred) and makes no contention that the hearing was deficient.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TANZER, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for resisting arrest, challenging the imposition of a condition of probation that he make $133 restitution for a policeman’s watch which was destroyed or missing as a result of the crime. He contends that there was no proof of the extent of the property damage or that it was related to the crime.

Defendant having made such an objection in the lower court, a hearing was held. He assigns no error to anything occurring during that hearing (indeed, he fails to mention that it occurred) and makes no contention that the hearing was deficient.

Affirmed.

State v. Christian, 593 P.2d 529, 39 Or. App. 691, 1979 Ore. App. LEXIS 2185 (Or. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

593 P.2d 529 (State v. Christian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.