State v. Christian

38 N.E.3d 888, 143 Ohio St. 3d 417
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 25, 2015·No. Nos. 2014-1318 and 2014-1554·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the court of appeals to consider the evidence of an enterprise in light of State v. Beverly, 143 Ohio St.3d 258, 2015-Ohio-219, 37 N.E.3d 116.

Mathias H. Heck, Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kirsten A. Brandt, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Brock A. Schoenlein, for appellee. O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Christian, 38 N.E.3d 888, 143 Ohio St. 3d 417 (Ohio 2015).

38 N.E.3d 888 (State v. Christian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Christian
2020 Ohio 3816 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2020)
State v. Christian (Slip Opinion)
2020 Ohio 828 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2020)
Centerville v. Knab
2019 Ohio 1903 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
State v. Turner
2018 Ohio 2860 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2018)
State v. Brewer
2017 Ohio 119 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2017)
State v. Gaus
2016 Ohio 4886 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2016)
In re M.A.
2016 Ohio 1161 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2016)
State v. Hewitt
2015 Ohio 5489 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2015)