State v. Cholon

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Cholon

804 S.E.2d 187, 370 N.C. 207, 2017 N.C. LEXIS 698, 2017 WL 4334325

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedSeptember 28, 2017

DocketNo. 87PA17

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 804 S.E.2d 187 (State v. Cholon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Cholon, 804 S.E.2d 187, 370 N.C. 207, 2017 N.C. LEXIS 698, 2017 WL 4334325 (N.C. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant's petition for discretionary review is allowed for the limited purpose of vacating the decision of the Court of Appeals and remanding to that court with instructions for further remand to the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing on defendant's motion for appropriated relief in light of State v. Todd , 369 N.C. 707, ----, 799 S.E. 2d 834, 835 (2017) (remanding for determination of whether counsel made a particular strategic decision and if so, whether such decision was reasonable), State v. Thomas , 327 N.C. 630, 630, 397 S.E.2d 79, 80 (1990) (remanding to determine whether the "defendant knowingly consented to trial counsel's concessions of guilt to the jury"), and other relevant authority. The trial court shall enter findings of facts and conclusions of law and determine whether defendant is entitled to relief.:

"By order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant's petition for discretionary review is allowed for the limited purpose of vacating the decision of the Court of Appeals and remanding to that court with instructions for further remand to the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing on defendant's motion for appropriated relief in light of State v. Todd , 369 N.C. 707, ----, 799 S.E. 2d 834, 835 (2017) (remanding for determination of whether counsel made a particular strategic decision and if so, whether such decision was reasonable), State v. Thomas , 327 N.C. 630, 630, 397 S.E.2d 79, 80 (1990) (remanding to determine whether the "defendant knowingly consented to trial counsel's concessions of guilt to the jury"), and other relevant authority. The trial court shall enter findings of facts and conclusions of law and determine whether defendant is entitled to relief.:

"By order of the Court in conference, this the 28th of September 2017."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

804 S.E.2d 187, 370 N.C. 207, 2017 N.C. LEXIS 698, 2017 WL 4334325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-cholon-nc-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack