State v. Chisolm

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Chisolm

281 A.2d 826, 161 Conn. 598

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 6, 1971·Published

Opinion

a) The “Motion For Determination That Piling Of Finding Of Fact Is Unnecessary” by the defendant from the Superior Court in Hartford County is denied.

b) The “Motion To Supreme Court For Oral Argument” by the defendant from the Superior Court in Hartford County is denied.

c) The motion to review the decision of the Superior Court in Hartford County revoking bail is reserved pending receipt of a finding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

a) The “Motion For Determination That Piling Of Finding Of Fact Is Unnecessary” by the defendant from the Superior Court in Hartford County is denied.

b) The “Motion To Supreme Court For Oral Argument” by the defendant from the Superior Court in Hartford County is denied.

c) The motion to review the decision of the Superior Court in Hartford County revoking bail is reserved pending receipt of a finding.

State v. Chisolm, 281 A.2d 826, 161 Conn. 598 (Colo. 1971).

Pincite

281 A.2d 826 (State v. Chisolm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.