State v. Chisolm

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Chisolm

281 A.2d 826, 161 Conn. 598

DecidedOctober 6, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 281 A.2d 826 (State v. Chisolm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Chisolm, 281 A.2d 826, 161 Conn. 598 (Colo. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

a) The “Motion For Determination That Piling Of Finding Of Fact Is Unnecessary” by the defendant from the Superior Court in Hartford County is denied.

b) The “Motion To Supreme Court For Oral Argument” by the defendant from the Superior Court in Hartford County is denied.

c) The motion to review the decision of the Superior Court in Hartford County revoking bail is reserved pending receipt of a finding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

a) The “Motion For Determination That Piling Of Finding Of Fact Is Unnecessary” by the defendant from the Superior Court in Hartford County is denied.

b) The “Motion To Supreme Court For Oral Argument” by the defendant from the Superior Court in Hartford County is denied.

c) The motion to review the decision of the Superior Court in Hartford County revoking bail is reserved pending receipt of a finding.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.2d 826, 161 Conn. 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-chisolm-conn-1971.