State v. Chism
This text of 249 S.W.3d 215 (State v. Chism) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Charles E. CHISM, Appellant.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Rosemary E. Percival, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.
Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, P.J., JOSEPH M. ELLIS, and THOMAS H. NEWTON, JJ.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mr. Charles E. Chism appeals his convictions and sentences of two concurrent fifteen-year terms for forcible rape, section 566.030 and forcible sodomy, section 566.060, to run consecutively with two concurrent seven-year terms for the two counts of second-degree domestic assault, section 565.073.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 S.W.3d 215, 2008 WL 423555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-chism-moctapp-2008.