State v. Chism

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Chism

809 S.W.2d 743, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 828, 1991 WL 96399

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 11, 1991·No. No. WD 41767·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Defendant was convicted after a jury trial of first degree assault and was sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment. Thereafter, he filed a motion to set aside the judgment under Rule 29.15, and that motion was denied after an evidentiary hearing. Defendant appeals both judgments. Those appeals have been consolidated by order of this court.

Both judgments are affirmed. Rules 30.-25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Defendant was convicted after a jury trial of first degree assault and was sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment. Thereafter, he filed a motion to set aside the judgment under Rule 29.15, and that motion was denied after an evidentiary hearing. Defendant appeals both judgments. Those appeals have been consolidated by order of this court.

Both judgments are affirmed. Rules 30.-25(b) and 84.16(b).

State v. Chism, 809 S.W.2d 743, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 828, 1991 WL 96399 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

809 S.W.2d 743 (State v. Chism) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.