State v. Chilton

894 N.E.2d 330, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1470
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 1, 2008
Docket2008-1497
StatusPublished

This text of 894 N.E.2d 330 (State v. Chilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Chilton, 894 N.E.2d 330, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1470 (Ohio 2008).

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 07AP-708, 2008-Ohio-2273. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Chilton, 07ap-708 (5-1-2008)
2008 Ohio 2273 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
894 N.E.2d 330, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-chilton-ohio-2008.