State v. Childs

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Childs

362 S.W.3d 491, 2012 WL 951862, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 353

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 20, 2012

DocketED 96488

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 362 S.W.3d 491 (State v. Childs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Childs, 362 S.W.3d 491, 2012 WL 951862, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 353 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Robert Childs appeals from a sentence and judgment of tampering in the first degree, asserting that the trial court erred in denying his request to strike one juror for cause, and in sentencing him as a prior and persistent offender. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Mo. R.Crim. P. 30.25(b) (2011).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Robert Childs appeals from a sentence and judgment of tampering in the first degree, asserting that the trial court erred in denying his request to strike one juror for cause, and in sentencing him as a prior and persistent offender. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Mo. R.Crim. P. 30.25(b) (2011).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

362 S.W.3d 491, 2012 WL 951862, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-childs-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack